People
The New Party News

News from the New Party

News Highlights

How to destroy political accountability
The 2010 General Election
Stop playing Scrooge Darling, we need tax cuts now
Government risks civil unrest over pensions
New Party sympathises with expenses backlash MPs
Miliband's carbon solution is to export employment during recession
New Party disappointed by CO2 advert adjudication delays
This year Christmas dinner will cost you £36million, if you are quick
IPPR plans would cause higher numbers to jump from UK Titanic
Stealth tax ‘shooting galleries’ creating killer roads
New Party slams 'perverse' lessons in domestic violence
UK needs to wake up and end this economic 'Greek tragedy'
New corruption figures highlight Kelly's Westminster failure
Queen's Speech a matter of the 'government's new clothes'
Labour's nuclear 'dithering' will have UK scrabbling in the dark, New Party leader tells nuclear heartland
YouTube debut for New Party following Politics Show appearance
Stop Westminster Council's bike rider robbery before it spreads nationwide
New Party calls for BBC to end its 'discrimination' of smaller political parties
New Party praises ASA for investigating 'sickening' carbon advert
Time to unburden 10 million low earners of income tax
'Orwellian' C02 advert prompts New Party call for withdrawal
Richard Vass' letter to the national press
Red Tape has left thousands across Britain jobless
Who are the real progressives?
Memories of '76
The reactionary left
The Democratic Imperative
Socialism for shoppers
Spivocracy in action
Precisely
The abdication of leadership
Rebuilding communities
The loser tendency
The United Nations: what moral authority?
How to banish cynicism
The Chancellor's iron grip - on power
British politics: Is it dead yet?

Friday, May 14, 2010

What is the LibCon?

If David Cameron looked with gleeful anticipation at the prospect of a coalition with the Liberal Democrats, that is not how it appeared during the election campaign.  At that time he said a hung parliament would be a disaster for Britain and was scathing about the Liberal Democrats.  Now the coalition is said to guarantee stability - indeed, it puts an end to the problem of 'short-term politics'. As Harold Wilson once observed, a week is a long time in politics.

To ensure the stability of his government, Cameron is proposing that a vote of no confidence would need at least 55 per cent support in the House of Commons in order to pass.  That is equivalent to a majority of 65 votes or more.  Such manipulation of our constitutional arrangements is in itself a scandalous indictment of the new government.  It is also, dare we say it, remarkably short term in its thinking, designed to smooth over the current possibility of the Liberal Democrats (with 57 MPs) being able to pull the plug on the Cameron government.

The problem is that it is a short term fix with long term implications.  If a government cannot command a majority in the House of Commons it should go, whether a new prime minister is put in place or an election is called.  That is our constitutional tradition.  Are we now to suppose that it is a virtuous mark of stability that a discredited government could remain in limbo, potentially for years, because it still commands 45 per cent of the House?

It makes us wonder why the Callaghan government back in the 1970s bothered pulling in MPs from their sick beds to vote on crucial votes when the simple expedient of an Enabling Bill could have saved it the trouble.

Constitutional vandalism aside, the new government has the perfect excuse to ditch any promise made during the campaign - the coalition agreement trumps any manifesto commitment.  While the country did not give a majority to any single party, it is true to say that nobody voted for the LibCon.  This is an accident waiting to happen.  In the coming weeks we will be outlining what this government means for our future.