People
The New Party News

News from the New Party

News Highlights

The 2010 General Election
Stop playing Scrooge Darling, we need tax cuts now
Government risks civil unrest over pensions
New Party sympathises with expenses backlash MPs
Miliband's carbon solution is to export employment during recession
New Party disappointed by CO2 advert adjudication delays
This year Christmas dinner will cost you £36million, if you are quick
IPPR plans would cause higher numbers to jump from UK Titanic
Stealth tax ‘shooting galleries’ creating killer roads
New Party slams 'perverse' lessons in domestic violence
UK needs to wake up and end this economic 'Greek tragedy'
New corruption figures highlight Kelly's Westminster failure
Queen's Speech a matter of the 'government's new clothes'
Labour's nuclear 'dithering' will have UK scrabbling in the dark, New Party leader tells nuclear heartland
YouTube debut for New Party following Politics Show appearance
Stop Westminster Council's bike rider robbery before it spreads nationwide
New Party calls for BBC to end its 'discrimination' of smaller political parties
New Party praises ASA for investigating 'sickening' carbon advert
Time to unburden 10 million low earners of income tax
'Orwellian' C02 advert prompts New Party call for withdrawal
Richard Vass' letter to the national press
Red Tape has left thousands across Britain jobless
Who are the real progressives?
Memories of '76
The reactionary left
The Democratic Imperative
Socialism for shoppers
Spivocracy in action
Precisely
The abdication of leadership
Rebuilding communities
The loser tendency
The United Nations: what moral authority?
How to banish cynicism
The Chancellor's iron grip - on power
British politics: Is it dead yet?

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

North Korea raises the stakes

To describe the Democratic People's Republic of Korea as a basket case would be an unwarranted slur upon baskets.  North Korea's communist government has drawn wide condemnation for its latest stunts, and for the statement that it no longer regards itself as bound by the 1953 ceasefire that marked the end of the Korean War.

So what does it all mean and what should the rest of the world, and in particular the West, do about it? 

The first thing to be said is that the North Korean national sport is bravado.  Pyongyang generates a lot of noise and issues plenty of threats designed to frighten the rest of the world, and in particular South Korea (and to some extent Japan).  The main pay-off that North Korea expects from this behaviour is some kind of appeasement.  It's not just North Korean belligerence that the rest of the world fears: the communist state has a fragile infrastructure (ignoring the military) and a starving, enslaved population.  The implication is that the collapse of the North Korean regime should scare us almost as much as their nuclear missiles.

The second point - already alluded to above - is that North Korea is protected above all by geography.  It is one thing for the United States to invade Iraq, but quite another to invade North Korea; not because it is militarily impossible, but because it is impossible without North Korea wreaking massive destruction in South Korea and Japan.

The only consideration that will restrain the North Korean regime is the understanding that if it exercises its nuclear capability to destroy its neighbours, it will bring the same destruction upon itself.  This, of course, assumes that the North Korean regime retains some sense of reason.  Thus far, thankfully, they have shown themselves to be remarkably good poker players, as communists go.