People
The New Party News

News from the New Party

News Highlights

The 2010 General Election
Stop playing Scrooge Darling, we need tax cuts now
Government risks civil unrest over pensions
New Party sympathises with expenses backlash MPs
Miliband's carbon solution is to export employment during recession
New Party disappointed by CO2 advert adjudication delays
This year Christmas dinner will cost you £36million, if you are quick
IPPR plans would cause higher numbers to jump from UK Titanic
Stealth tax ‘shooting galleries’ creating killer roads
New Party slams 'perverse' lessons in domestic violence
UK needs to wake up and end this economic 'Greek tragedy'
New corruption figures highlight Kelly's Westminster failure
Queen's Speech a matter of the 'government's new clothes'
Labour's nuclear 'dithering' will have UK scrabbling in the dark, New Party leader tells nuclear heartland
YouTube debut for New Party following Politics Show appearance
Stop Westminster Council's bike rider robbery before it spreads nationwide
New Party calls for BBC to end its 'discrimination' of smaller political parties
New Party praises ASA for investigating 'sickening' carbon advert
Time to unburden 10 million low earners of income tax
'Orwellian' C02 advert prompts New Party call for withdrawal
Richard Vass' letter to the national press
Red Tape has left thousands across Britain jobless
Who are the real progressives?
Memories of '76
The reactionary left
The Democratic Imperative
Socialism for shoppers
Spivocracy in action
Precisely
The abdication of leadership
Rebuilding communities
The loser tendency
The United Nations: what moral authority?
How to banish cynicism
The Chancellor's iron grip - on power
British politics: Is it dead yet?

Sunday, May 25, 2008

In the Brown stuff

There seems to be little doubt, from the practically unanimous opinion of the British media, that Gordon Brown's premiership has entered an endgame of some description.  It is said that half of the Brown cabinet do not believe that Labour can win the next general election with Gordon Brown at the helm.  Many Labour MPs do not believe that Labour can win the next election in any case.  For them the issue is rather different: can Labour lose the next election by a respectable margin which gives them a fighting chance after a single Tory term of office?  The stark alternative is a meltdown of 1997 proportions which would see Labour out of office for a political generation.

The one common factor to any scenario is that Brown is finished.  Brown is Major-plus: while the prime minister's dwindling band of supporters are wistfully expressing the hope that support will return to Labour when the credit crunch passes, nobody really believes that this is the case.  Opinion polls and election results agree on the scale of Labour's plight: no governing party has recovered from such a desperate position to win the next election.  Tim Hames recalls the only exception within living memory - the Mid-Staffordshire by-election of 1990, which the Conservatives lost in similar circumstances to Thursday's crewe result:
The then Political Editor of The Times (Robin Oakley) duly reported the next day that if this switch in sentiment “were to be repeated nationally at the next election, every single member of Mrs Margaret Thatcher’s Cabinet save John Major, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, would lose his seat”.

This did not happen. Far from it. Despite a continuing economic malaise, ministers won a surprise fourth term in office (recapturing Mid-Staffordshire as they did) in part because voters remained to be fully convinced that the Opposition had changed sufficiently. The Tories did, however, have to dump their leader in order to find salvation. No crumb of comfort there for Mr Brown.
All logic and sanity therefore seems to point to the necessity for Labour to replace Gordon Brown as a matter of urgency.  Iain Dale however puts forward a different view:
If he voluntarily stepped aside in the next few weeks and a new leader had time to establish themselves, you can make a coherent argument for them being able to turn around Labour fortunes, except for one thing. It is inconceivable that the British public, let alone the press, would accept a second unelected Prime Minister within a year.

There is also no clear frontrunner to take over. The only two people I can see actually having a chance of success would either not run or not win - and I'm talking about Alan Johnson and Hilary Benn.

In the second scenario, where Gordon Brown is ditched, the mess which would be created along the way would render the party unelectable afterwards - no matter who emerged. And with the same electoral college system which allowed Harriet Harman to win the Deputy Leadership, you have to wonder just who might emerge from that process.

Labour's best chance is to stick with Brown in the hope that he will be able to pull a rabbit out of the bag. But with his luck, any such rabbit would probably be struck down with myxomatosis.
In spite of everything. it would seem that Dale's analysis is much closer to the way the Labour Party is actually leaning at the moment.  However awful their predicament now, there is no guarantee that a new leader would be any better than Gordon - or indeed that the voters would take any notice of any improvement anyway.  And so this incompetent government will limp on, and the Conservative Party will quite properly continue to draw maximum advantage.  But while Gordon Brown's troubles are good news for the Conservative Party, they cannot be good news for the country.  We need strong, firm and effective leadership in these difficult economic times.  We are not likely to get it.