People
The New Party News

News from the New Party

News Highlights

How to destroy political accountability
The 2010 General Election
Stop playing Scrooge Darling, we need tax cuts now
Government risks civil unrest over pensions
New Party sympathises with expenses backlash MPs
Miliband's carbon solution is to export employment during recession
New Party disappointed by CO2 advert adjudication delays
This year Christmas dinner will cost you £36million, if you are quick
IPPR plans would cause higher numbers to jump from UK Titanic
Stealth tax ‘shooting galleries’ creating killer roads
New Party slams 'perverse' lessons in domestic violence
UK needs to wake up and end this economic 'Greek tragedy'
New corruption figures highlight Kelly's Westminster failure
Queen's Speech a matter of the 'government's new clothes'
Labour's nuclear 'dithering' will have UK scrabbling in the dark, New Party leader tells nuclear heartland
YouTube debut for New Party following Politics Show appearance
Stop Westminster Council's bike rider robbery before it spreads nationwide
New Party calls for BBC to end its 'discrimination' of smaller political parties
New Party praises ASA for investigating 'sickening' carbon advert
Time to unburden 10 million low earners of income tax
'Orwellian' C02 advert prompts New Party call for withdrawal
Richard Vass' letter to the national press
Red Tape has left thousands across Britain jobless
Who are the real progressives?
Memories of '76
The reactionary left
The Democratic Imperative
Socialism for shoppers
Spivocracy in action
Precisely
The abdication of leadership
Rebuilding communities
The loser tendency
The United Nations: what moral authority?
How to banish cynicism
The Chancellor's iron grip - on power
British politics: Is it dead yet?

Sunday, May 27, 2007

When Nanny goes bad

The Times this week reported a dramatic change in the advice given to pregnant women relating to alcohol consumption during pregnancy. 
Women who are pregnant or trying for a baby should stop drinking alcohol altogether, the Government’s leading doctors give warning today.

The new advice radically revises existing guidelines, which say that women can drink up to two units once or twice a week. Fiona Adshead, the deputy chief medical officer, said that the change was meant to send “a strong signal” to the thousands of women who drank more than the recommended limit that they were putting their babies at risk. But she admitted that it was not in response to any new medical evidence.

Daniel Finkelstein sounds a justifiable note of alarm:
This is merely the latest instalment of an extremely dangerous development. The public health profession has long seen itself as having a political role in making us behave as it wishes, rather than simply providing us with information.

Now it has moved on to using deceit as a tactic to advance its various causes.

I am a strong supporter of the MMR vaccination. How, now, do I respond to readers who say that the medical profession is quite willing to lie to them when it wants to get its way?

How, indeed?  We have become accustomed to the term "nanny state" to describe the inclination of government to intervene in areas of personal and family life which have customarily been regarded as in the private realm.  "Nanny knows best" is a dubious political attitude at the best of times; now that we know that Nanny is prepared to twist the facts to get her own way, we are in a rather murkier situation.  Increasingly we live in a "post-democratic" society where bureaucrats, lawyers NGOs (non-governmental organisations) and "experts" wield enormous power.  Ordinary voters (and for that matter politicians) are increasingly dependent on this new class, for want of a better term.  In issue after issue these days, from climate change to the workings of the European Union we are presented with supposed faits accomplis which governments either cannot escape, or can claim not to be able to escape.  When this expert class goes bad, either acting according to its own agenda, or manipulated to work for someone else's agenda, the normal processes of democracy cannot function.

Is it too much to ask of these experts just to give us the facts, and let us make up our own mind?