People
The New Party News

News from the New Party

News Highlights

How to destroy political accountability
The 2010 General Election
Stop playing Scrooge Darling, we need tax cuts now
Government risks civil unrest over pensions
New Party sympathises with expenses backlash MPs
Miliband's carbon solution is to export employment during recession
New Party disappointed by CO2 advert adjudication delays
This year Christmas dinner will cost you £36million, if you are quick
IPPR plans would cause higher numbers to jump from UK Titanic
Stealth tax ‘shooting galleries’ creating killer roads
New Party slams 'perverse' lessons in domestic violence
UK needs to wake up and end this economic 'Greek tragedy'
New corruption figures highlight Kelly's Westminster failure
Queen's Speech a matter of the 'government's new clothes'
Labour's nuclear 'dithering' will have UK scrabbling in the dark, New Party leader tells nuclear heartland
YouTube debut for New Party following Politics Show appearance
Stop Westminster Council's bike rider robbery before it spreads nationwide
New Party calls for BBC to end its 'discrimination' of smaller political parties
New Party praises ASA for investigating 'sickening' carbon advert
Time to unburden 10 million low earners of income tax
'Orwellian' C02 advert prompts New Party call for withdrawal
Richard Vass' letter to the national press
Red Tape has left thousands across Britain jobless
Who are the real progressives?
Memories of '76
The reactionary left
The Democratic Imperative
Socialism for shoppers
Spivocracy in action
Precisely
The abdication of leadership
Rebuilding communities
The loser tendency
The United Nations: what moral authority?
How to banish cynicism
The Chancellor's iron grip - on power
British politics: Is it dead yet?

Friday, January 26, 2007

The limits to tolerance

A report by Sir Keith Ajegbo proposes that English schoolchildren should be taught "Britishness". The reason that this proposal is restricted to the children of England is not that the English are particularly in need of such education, but merely because Scotland and Wales are now obliged to make their own arrangements about such things. The British values which need so urgently to be inculcated in English youth are regarded as being: "freedom of speech, the rule of law, mutual tolerance and respect for equal rights".

The row over the exemption, or not, of Catholic adoption agencies from the new regulations preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians in the provision of goods and services, presents a significant challenge to this concept of tolerance, no less than to the "respect of equal rights". There is the distinct possibility here of the effective coercion of members of faith communities to act directly against their own conscience. If Catholic adoption agencies are to be obliged to place children with gay couples, are Catholic priests (or Church of England priests, for that matter) to be obliged, at least in principle, to perform marriage services for gay couples? And if this is the case, then what are the consequences for religious practice in this country - or indeed for the freedom of anyone else? We already live in a country where it has seriously been suggested that a ballerina should not be allowed to work because of her political affiliation - a state of affairs more reminiscent of the Soviet Union in the 1970s than the United Kingdom of the 21st Century.

It is reasonably clear that the mood of the country at large is that gays and lesbians, and gay and lesbian couples, should not be discriminated against and that legislation to prevent discrimination can be justified on democratic grounds alone, regardless of whatever other political, moral or theological arguments may be brought to bear on the matter.

However, things are not that simple. We have had a government for the last ten years which has made a point of promoting protection and respect for minorities within society, and that includes respect for religious minorities. It was this government that introduced the ill-fated and ill-conceived Incitement to Religious Hatred legislation, which was designed to offer protection to Muslims in particular (Christians, Jews, Sikhs and Hindus theoretically being protected by other legislation). Nevertheless, this was not enough to spare the former head of the Muslim Council of Britain, Sir Iqbal Sacranie, from a police investigation for comments he made about the teaching of Islam with respect to homosexuals in an interview for BBC Radio 4.

A society which is serious about expecting tolerance from its citizens needs to show some tolerance itself. A society which is serious about freedom of speech should also, logically, be serious about freedom of belief. There is no reason why compromise cannot be reached on the Catholic adoption row. One possibility that has been mooted is that Catholic adoption agencies might agree to refer gay couples to other agencies. Whether or not the Catholic Church is granted an exemption from the new regulations will have no bearing at all on the number of children adopted by gay couples overall. So why is coercion necessary? If the point is to mount an attack on religious freedom then we really are in need of a lesson in "British values".