People
The New Party News

News from the New Party

News Highlights

How to destroy political accountability
The 2010 General Election
Stop playing Scrooge Darling, we need tax cuts now
Government risks civil unrest over pensions
New Party sympathises with expenses backlash MPs
Miliband's carbon solution is to export employment during recession
New Party disappointed by CO2 advert adjudication delays
This year Christmas dinner will cost you £36million, if you are quick
IPPR plans would cause higher numbers to jump from UK Titanic
Stealth tax ‘shooting galleries’ creating killer roads
New Party slams 'perverse' lessons in domestic violence
UK needs to wake up and end this economic 'Greek tragedy'
New corruption figures highlight Kelly's Westminster failure
Queen's Speech a matter of the 'government's new clothes'
Labour's nuclear 'dithering' will have UK scrabbling in the dark, New Party leader tells nuclear heartland
YouTube debut for New Party following Politics Show appearance
Stop Westminster Council's bike rider robbery before it spreads nationwide
New Party calls for BBC to end its 'discrimination' of smaller political parties
New Party praises ASA for investigating 'sickening' carbon advert
Time to unburden 10 million low earners of income tax
'Orwellian' C02 advert prompts New Party call for withdrawal
Richard Vass' letter to the national press
Red Tape has left thousands across Britain jobless
Who are the real progressives?
Memories of '76
The reactionary left
The Democratic Imperative
Socialism for shoppers
Spivocracy in action
Precisely
The abdication of leadership
Rebuilding communities
The loser tendency
The United Nations: what moral authority?
How to banish cynicism
The Chancellor's iron grip - on power
British politics: Is it dead yet?

Friday, February 27, 2009

Mob rule

There is precious little sympathy for those who have lately been running our banks but they are nevertheless entitled to the same protection from the law as the rest of us.

Sir Fred Goodwin, lately of the Royal Bank of Scotland, is the fortunate beneficiary of a pension of well over £600,000 a year, and it is pretty obvious that the government wants most of it back.  And not just the government.  Parliament, the press and the blogosphere are in uproar.  The man in the street is outraged.

Regardless of the legalities of the case, and in view of the damage wrought to our public finances the extremely unsavoury nature of the case, Sir Fred is entitled to his money.  Contracts freely entered into cannot just be overturned on a whim.  If we go down that road we are not just leaving ourselves open to chaos, but ultimately fascism.

It should not be forgotten that this situation could not have occurred if a satisfactory and effective regulatory regime were in place.  Evidently such regulation as there has been has been woeful.  Responsibility for this must ultimately reside with the government, a thought which no doubt has occurred to Labour ministers and others who seek to pin the blame on anyone other than the resident of 10 Downing Street.  Gordon Brown's pension pot may not be as large as Sir Fred Goodwin's, but we assume that it is as safe as anybody else's in the current circumstances.

There is, moreover, a more satisfactory method of expressing public anger and disgust at the individuals through whose carelessness the financial future of all of us has been jeopardised.  Many of the individuals concerned carry titles: knighthoods, peerages, awards of other kinds.  Her Majesty giveth, and Her Majesty taketh away.

Arise, Mr Fred Goodwin.