People
The New Party News

News from the New Party

News Highlights

How to destroy political accountability
The 2010 General Election
Stop playing Scrooge Darling, we need tax cuts now
Government risks civil unrest over pensions
New Party sympathises with expenses backlash MPs
Miliband's carbon solution is to export employment during recession
New Party disappointed by CO2 advert adjudication delays
This year Christmas dinner will cost you £36million, if you are quick
IPPR plans would cause higher numbers to jump from UK Titanic
Stealth tax ‘shooting galleries’ creating killer roads
New Party slams 'perverse' lessons in domestic violence
UK needs to wake up and end this economic 'Greek tragedy'
New corruption figures highlight Kelly's Westminster failure
Queen's Speech a matter of the 'government's new clothes'
Labour's nuclear 'dithering' will have UK scrabbling in the dark, New Party leader tells nuclear heartland
YouTube debut for New Party following Politics Show appearance
Stop Westminster Council's bike rider robbery before it spreads nationwide
New Party calls for BBC to end its 'discrimination' of smaller political parties
New Party praises ASA for investigating 'sickening' carbon advert
Time to unburden 10 million low earners of income tax
'Orwellian' C02 advert prompts New Party call for withdrawal
Richard Vass' letter to the national press
Red Tape has left thousands across Britain jobless
Who are the real progressives?
Memories of '76
The reactionary left
The Democratic Imperative
Socialism for shoppers
Spivocracy in action
Precisely
The abdication of leadership
Rebuilding communities
The loser tendency
The United Nations: what moral authority?
How to banish cynicism
The Chancellor's iron grip - on power
British politics: Is it dead yet?

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Pakistan: An uncertain future

The resignation of Pakistan’s president, Pervez Musharraf, comes at a difficult time for the war against Al-Qaeda in the region.  Pakistan was always problematic as an ally with many officials clearly unhappy with Musharraf’s alliance with the US and with elements of the intelligence service (the ISI) sympathising with Al-Qaeda and the Taleban.  But Musharraf at least seemed determined to support the war on terrorism and there is no doubt that the US considered him a vital ally.

But how much of an ally was he really?  Oliver Kamm is dismissive:
Musharraf has not been a reliable ally of the Western democracies; he made a pragmatic calculation, and has gained far more from allying with the Western democracies than our side has got in return. He has received aid, debt relief and - most significant - a softening of the accurate perception of Pakistan as a state that supports terrorism. He has delivered little in the way of a security clampdown on Islamist terrorism. It's true that the British authorities investigating the 7/7 bombers have been assisted by police action in Pakistan. But Pakistan has not acted as it ought to have done against domestic Islamist cells, only against foreign terrorist suspects.

Musharraf has violated constitutional principles. His political legacy is a highly unstable state. He has pursued nuclear proliferation and thereby hastened the terrible prospect that there will one day be a nuclear-armed Islamist state. Pakistan's intelligence service, the ISI, is in effect a state within a state, and is widely suspected of links with Islamist terrorists. Ominously, it has repelled efforts to bring it under civilian control.
The alliance with Musharraf was one of realpolitik that, as ever, will come back to bite us.  We are left with tremendous uncertainty in the region and an unstable nuclear state that could easily fall prey to extremism.