News from the New Party
| Sunday, April 15, 2007 |
"Don't just do something, stand there."
According to Irwin Stelzer, President Reagan once demanded of his associates: "Don't just do something, stand there." Stelzer recommends a similar policy for a Gordon Brown premiership. Gordon Brown needs to learn that where government is concerned, less is more. Hyperactive government, consuming an ever increasing proportion of the national cake through taxation, and delivering, or failing to deliver, public services of sufficient quality to compensate the tax-payer, is likely to be one of Brown's key problems. For Stelzer suggests that middle class support for the welfare state, which has been a crucial sustaining factor for New Labour, may be about to subside:
Middle-class support for the welfare state is not what it once was. That support rested on two pillars. The first was a (mistaken) belief on the part of the middle class that the value of the direct benefits they received exceeded the taxes extracted from them. These benefits were always recognised explicitly by the Left as a necessity — an unfortunate one, but a necessity nevertheless — to buy voter support for the redistribution that is at the heart of the welfare state. Unfortunately for Brown, he has used up his bribe money: he can’t afford any more goodies for the middle class, on which he has loaded a succession of tax increases. And he has presided over the pouring of huge sums down the rat hole of an unreformed health service. So Middle England and hard-pressed blue-collar workers are not as willing as they once were to sanction expansion of the welfare state.
The second pillar on which middle- and working-class support for the welfare state rested was a belief that aiding the less fortunate is the decent thing to do. Although the phrase ‘deserving poor’ went out with the Victorians, the idea behind it is as current today as it was some 150 years ago. Unfortunately for Brown, he will be moving into No. 10 when rumblings grow louder about welfare cheats, the increasing number of healthy malingerers drawing disability benefits, and recipients of benefits refusing to accept responsibility for the behaviour of their offspring.
Unless Prime Minister Brown can find some way of reducing the burden of the state on the middle class, of cleaning up the benefits system so that the undeserving are less well treated, and of getting value for money spent, he might be the Prime Minister who presides over the beginning of the unravelling of the welfare state. Whilst Stelzer also notes that Tony Blair has understood this problem and attempted to remedy it through reform, this effort has been largely unsuccessful (and in large part thwarted by the Treasury). Of course it is correct to point out that reform in this area is absolutely and urgently necessary: furthermore, the reform needs to be "root and branch". Rearranging the deck chairs on the HMS NHS will not do, and it's not just the health service that's the problem. The benefits system and the education system both need urgent attention.
But if the Brown premiership is to be cut short by a middle class failure to support ongoing sovietisation of the economy through ever higher taxation spent on ever poorer services, then it has to be asked who is going to deliver the goods, if not New Labour.
The answer is that currently, no major political party is prepared to grasp the nettle of public service reform. The Conservatives certainly are not - David Cameron has actually promised to leave the National Health Service alone, as though the NHS can be saved by sheer force of will. A decent education system will not fall out of the sky on the day of a Conservative Party general election victory, either. The Tories these days are committed to managing socialism rather than liberating capitalism. No danger of tax cuts here. While the middle class may have had enough of funding a bloated and inefficient welfare state, the political class is now largely united in its commitment to procure the finance to do just that. If the British electorate choose to throw out Gordon Brown at the first opportunity on the grounds of excessive taxation or substandard public services, they may be sorely disappointed by Brown's replacement.
|
|